|
|
@@ -76,7 +76,8 @@
|
|
|
(p-card "why not forgejo"
|
|
|
"Because forgejo recently added vscode and intellij idea buttons. I wouldn't like to use software which assumes that I use electron-based or just corpo-related editors/IDEs."
|
|
|
"I used to use codeberg (they have own forgejo fork) for 4 years, but migrated after that change."
|
|
|
- "Instance which I currently use is based on gogs.")
|
|
|
+ "Instance which I currently use is based on gogs. Yet recently I found that gogs developers use claude for vulnerability detection and it has toxic AGENTS.md."
|
|
|
+ "Next step after gogs probably will be gitweb with custom scripts because it is the simplest solution which is not stagit.")
|
|
|
(p-card "why bsd"
|
|
|
"Before switching to BSD I used to use various GNU/Linux and GNU-less/Linux distros for 5 years (antix, devuan, artix, alpine, chimera)."
|
|
|
"The breakpoint when I switched was after Linux-the-kernel 6.17~ released and listed rust in kernel as no-longer-experimental thing."
|
|
|
@@ -131,8 +132,21 @@
|
|
|
"In lisps it is absolutely normal, because infix operators are uncommon and usually defined with syntax rules explicitly by user."
|
|
|
"Some imperative languages arguably have more noise. For example rust uses exclamation mark both for unary \"not\" and macros;"
|
|
|
"ampersand for pointers and bitwise \"and\"; single-quote for lifetimes and character constants; angle brackets for binary comparison and generics, and so on.")
|
|
|
+ (p-card "opinion on ai"
|
|
|
+ "\"AI will replace developers\": AI won't replace developers any time soon. It's just a tool, and to use it properly people still need to have some knowledge of programming concepts,"
|
|
|
+ "otherwise they won't be able to fix content which it generates, if they are doing something seriously: it frequently reports false positives and false negatives."
|
|
|
+ "Microsoft apparently has lack of real intelligence, or I have no other explanation why"
|
|
|
+ "Windows 11 recently caused massive deaths of SSDs after announcing that huge amount of code in Windows is written by AI."
|
|
|
+ "Will it be cheaper to use AI? Probably not, because companies will have to pay both to ai-operators (real humans who use AI) and to AI-companies for subscriptions,"
|
|
|
+ "not to mention how much more expensive hardware will become because of ai data centers (that will affect everyone: business, developers, and even users)."
|
|
|
+ "That definitely will increase companies' expenses and lower salaries, which potentially might create migration of intelligence: some corpo-developers could resign and"
|
|
|
+ (escape "fond/join to") "development of ai-free alternatives of software they used to write for corporations."
|
|
|
+ "It is also unclear how to license code generated by AI, because it was trained on projects (code and assets) with all possible licenses:"
|
|
|
+ "[L]GPLv%i, BSD-%iClause, WTFPL, Apache, Zlib, public domain, decompiled proprietary code."
|
|
|
+ "I personally try to avoid not only software which has ai chats/assistants, but also software which has AI contributions in commit history."
|
|
|
+ "That's why I don't use original vim, neovim and am skeptical of gogs-based instances. All of that was about GEN-AI.")
|
|
|
(p-card "opinion on rgb"
|
|
|
- "Only things with rgb i have are keyboard, mouse and gpu. All of those are either set to static color or entirely disabled."
|
|
|
+ "Only things with rgb I have are keyboard, mouse and gpu. All of those are either set to static color or entirely disabled."
|
|
|
"At that point rgb is not even that expensive, but if cheaper non-rgb versions exist and are not sacrificing any functionality I will choose those.")
|
|
|
(p-card "opinion on RISC-V"
|
|
|
"It's great open architecture, yet I am not running it because such platforms are quite expensive"
|
